Table 2. Salmonella-related recalls and human outbreaks associated with pet foods (1999–2024)

Aspect Key findings
General overview Salmonella can persist under dry conditions, enabling long-term survival in pet food products [44].FDA, CDC, and state authorities investigate contamination events, and most recalls are voluntary. Between 2003 and 2022, 859 pet food recalls were reported, accounting for 24% of all recalls and 85% of recalls due to bacterial pathogens [45].
Human outbreaks linked to pet food ․ 1999 (Canada): Pig ear treats, Salmonella enterica serovar Infants [27].․ 2002 (Texas, USA): Imported beef treats, S. Newport, including a 1-month-old infant [46].․ 2005 (USA/Canada): Frozen beef and salmon treats, S. Thompson, 9 cases [42].․ 2007–2008 (USA): Kibble from Pennsylvania facility, S. Schwarzengrund, 79 cases across 21 states [47].․ 2012 (South Carolina, USA): Dry pet food, 49 cases in USA/Canada.․ 2013 (New Hampshire, USA): Treat facility, 43 cases and 16 hospitalizations; outbreak strain detected in 78% of environmental samples [48].․ 2017–2019: S. Reading outbreak, 358 cases in 42 states, 1 fatality, 64% MDR strains; identical strain found in raw turkey, raw pet food, and human isolates.․ Additional outbreaks: S. Reading (2018), pig ear treats (2019), S. Kiambu in infants (2023).
Distribution of recalls by product type (1999–2024, n=859) Treats: 33.3%; Dry food: 29.1%; Raw meat-based diets (RMBD): 30%; Supplements: 4.2%; Wet food: 1.7%.
Distribution of human outbreaks by product type Treats: 45.5%; RMBD: 27.3%; Dry food: 27.3%. Among all outbreaks, 45.5% were associated with MDR serovars, and one case involved an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strain.
Recent situation (2021–Jun 2024, USA) A total of 21 Salmonella-related recalls were reported, of which 8 involved RMBD. Human cases were disproportionately observed among infants and elderly individuals, underscoring the need for enhanced hygiene education and protective measures for vulnerable groups.
Data include both finished products and raw materials implicated in recalls. Reported prevalence and case numbers vary by country, product type, and study methodology. Some surveys lacked confirmatory testing, which may affect the accuracy of prevalence estimates.
FDA, Food and Drug Administration; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; MDR, multidrug-resistant; XDR, extensively drug-resistant.